Cooperation, community, self-sufficiency. Not only a must in life, but within the online sphere. Had the "law of the jungle" rang true, the existence of man would be none; frankly, those who assume supreme authority is required for life must reconsider the basis of what man is. "But what happens if...?" Must we quibble about how a society based upon defending your fellow man would handle what one presumes is chaos? A valid critique, but such is often a tactic of bullying; oh, where has the debate gone? Have we truly put all our soul into a sole man with increasing power?
Of course, I am not here to lecture the statists on the validity of statelessness - as much my alignments aspire. I come here to express qualms of the lack of community. For the unenlightened, my journey as a presently dormant game developer takes roots in a familiar name: Scratch. Whether you [the reader] dabbled in joyous block-coding or legitimate "big time" creations, the experienced cannot but observe the state of this website; cold, dry, a monotonous cave of atomized peoples.
In the opposing corner is Scratch, actively fostering a website where tykes may befriend and descend into the decentralized communities of games. Yes, many mature individuals such as I would criticize the neglected potential of such models, but simultaneously provides a comparison to what Snap! could be.
There be no method of connection, no sharing of creations, nothing of significance. At most, this is considered an educational tool; otherwise, a do-nothing place. I hence plea to this community, its developers, the collective, to adopt a simplistic trajectory towards a communitarian Snap!.
My recommendations for such a movement are the following:
-
Implement a commenting system on projects: Taken from Scratch but would guarantee greater interaction between users.
-
Fancier profiles: An actual bio, user page, and the whole shebang would look nice.
-
Love and favorite system: Allow users to bookmark and like projects onsite; a "star system" similar to Newgrounds has also been advocated.
-
Renovation of the program: handling larger projects, less visual bugginess, and overall performance improvements are welcome under any circumstance; TurboWarp provides inspiration aplenty in methods of speed upgrades.
-
Deliberative democracy: A system not of votes, but of synergy is to be utilized in decision making; websites such as Wikipedia have adopted this.
To whom it concerns, a revolution of sorts is required. Authority has failed repeatedly in terms of connectedness to its people, and a bottom-up structure is by no means utopian. In the end, the seeds of change must be planted.
Considered even in concept would be grandly appreciated. Sincere thanks.