I am not sure whether this is a bug or a feature. When I designate a procedure as "For this sprite only" I am unable to use Tell in another procedure to cause that action to happen. The other sprite cannot "see" that procedure name (which I am fine with) BUT I thought that I could construct a Tell block in the target sprite's script area, then pull it into the other sprite for execution. When I try that, the local procedure name does not get copied with the block. Is this a bug, or is coordination of one sprite's actions by another a Horrible Idea?
Here is a very simple project where I was playing with this:
What block is this? I looked in my Sensing palette (blue) and the only block with an "of" would not allow a procedure name to be inserted as the first parameter. Is it standard or something from a library?
drag it out - change the 2nd dropdown to the name of the sprite - then the 1st dropdown will have your block in it
Oh!! Well, I've learned something about the editor that I had not known. Thank you. This will probably affect me more than being able to use this coordination method. 
Its very useful block to know about but it goes against the general philosophy of setting parameters from left to right
Well, I doubt this is the first time that an implementation detail has violated a norm. Snort!
I don't think how it is run is the issue
run((pulse gift v)of(gift v))
thats snaps problems
we need all functions to be first class
not just be able to turn them into first class like this:({foo()})
actually it would be more like
