basically any easing that says "in" behaves like "out" and vice versa
it kind of defeats the entire purpose of the library (being to add easing functions) and then have the one thing it does not be correct
this is still really annoying to fix because every time you use the library you have to go into the easing block and invert all its functions and then i forget i did it already and accidentally change it back to the wrong one its just a mess
it cant be too hard to fix you just have to replace the "easing []" block with this one
and it fixes the whole library
At first I worried it would break older projects but those older projects will be using the older version of the library as well so it should still be fine
exactly, I don't think swapping the names is going to affect any old project. If you like feel free to send me pull-request, then you've got your name/handle officially in the repo
(if you don't care for Github, no worries, I'll do it myself, but don't hold your breath, I've opened a Github issue so don't forget about it while I'm entrenched in other campaigns)
Yeah my school doesn’t let us use email accounts outside our organization nor receive emails from outside our organization. So I can sign up for a GitHub on here
I see now; the max block picks the greater value provided in the block's inputs, and the min block does the opposite. I've never messed around with them as much as I have now.
be 
, and 
