It's a text shell. Sadly i can't add Alonzo... But i can if i release my OS soon.
I meant alonzo church,and I didn't expect a shell to have lambda calculus anyways(only scheme,snap and haskell fully deserve that :~P)if it was not called lonzo shell
This Lonzo thing is off topic ya know? Sorry to break it... But the main thing i want people to reply is feedback, bug reports, optimization tips, and new commands i will surely add. If you have time, you can give me some feedback on the project if you want! Though i've never heard of that church before
Alonzo Church + Snap
The Snap mascot, Alonzo (looks like Gobo but has Lambda-looking hair) is named after Alonzo Church (the mathematician).
Uh...Maybe?But I still think that there aren't any lambda or grey rings that you could program.
what do you mean?
Can you give me an idea or a way of how to implement this? I don't know much about these blocks.
I couldn't find the OS.
what OS?
oops... i forgot that importing the blocks replaces every one of my already imported blocks... hol up
missing autorun.inf
delete "A:" and start the project twice.
Typing in it is very slow for me...
And it takes a while to clear the screen as well.
And the screen doesn't scroll when the text goes off-screen...
I am excited to see batch script simulation, though.
This project reminds me of my GNU Bash project with three outstanding commands.
Here it is if you want to see it
I might be able to fix these bugs before March 2.
Might be your specs... It might be that the project requires more processing to do it.
Oh... I forgot to add it back when I tried to optimise screen updating...
I'll be trying this project soon and see if I can use some of the blocks inside for improvements... (and that will mean rewriting the entire project...)
I don't think so, I can create a 480 x 360 randomized pixel color for each pixel in less than half a second (which is a short amount of time for Snap!).
And we're not even doing image modification, were just writing text to the screen! Try putting scripts inside hat blocks into their own custom block.
You tried to optimise[sic] it? Or you did optimize it?
I didn't mean for you to do that, but you can if you want.