Improvement to the do in paralell and wait block

[sathvikrias]

can you change the do in paralell and wait block definition to

edit: change it to

sorry I made it so big
I don't know why it needed the number 0 to work

[herodooble2]

That seems like a good idea
Support

[sathvikrias]

thank you

[herodooble2]

your welcome

[bh]

Your version doesn't have the desired behavior. It continues the script below the block when ITEM 1 OF ACTIONS finishes, but that might not be the one that takes the longest time. The idea is not to continue the script until all the branches are complete.

[18001767679]

Also,it is not in parell.Look at the code carefully!

[sathvikrias]

@bh

Your version doesn't have the desired behavior. It continues the script below the block when ITEM 1 OF ACTIONS finishes, but that might not be the one that takes the longest time. The idea is not to continue the script until all the branches are complete.

okay, I made a new script:

or, this project

[sathvikrias]

I don't know why It needed the number 0 to work

[pumpkinhead]

you can also make countdown a number instead

[sathvikrias]

I find mine easier to understand, but that works too.

[cymplecy]

Just curious - what is wrong with the current block?

[pumpkinhead]

i guess it's too complicated?

[sathvikrias]

yeah so I made an easier way and so did @pumpkinhead

[sathvikrias]

@bh? now is it good?

[bh]

Yeah I guess.

Right now I'm working on speeding up the APL library, so I'll get to this in a while. No hurry since the existing one works. :~)