Just like that turbowarp record button, :
It would be cool if there was a record button::
(sorry for bad editing)
(it would save as .webm or .mp4 after you record it)
before you record a record option dialog will show up
just like turbowarp:
Just like that turbowarp record button, :
It would be cool if there was a record button::
(sorry for bad editing)
(it would save as .webm or .mp4 after you record it)
before you record a record option dialog will show up
just like turbowarp:
There's not many times a screen recording is needed - people can just run the project to see what it does
When I occasionally need to record, I use a screen recording app called Screencast-O-Matic on my windows machine.
I like it but still @cymplecy is right
yeah but my screen recording is very laggy, its like 0.001 fps
but turbowarp screen recording is like 30 fps or something
I definitely sympathize, especially the bits about when to start and stop recording.
But Snap! is pretty huge and hard to maintain already, and every time we add a capability that's really an independent task it just gets worse. (Arguably instead of including a paint editor we should link to an external one, for example.)
But this sounds like a perfect test case for the new extensions feature! As something that can be loaded as an option, it'd have no downside that I can see.
I agree but do the extension features make stuff more laggy?
Not in general; any particular extension might, of course.
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.