Then "who" isn't on it either.
I'm going to say "hello i am here"
BTW are you on mine? Because joecooldoo's doesn't have "here" in the whitelist.
Wait for joe to Neo nine, when they do become online ask them. We need all the requests we can take for the whitelist.
I have several more words on my whitelist.
Why don't just reinvent our whitelist, but instead of scanning for viable words, we can take out swear words and offensive words and just replace them with *'s or #'s instead.
That would be a blacklist.
That's what I'm trying to say. Why don't we just have a blacklist or something like that?
I'm trying to input my username to tell others who I am. It's not working.
I just added your username to mine.
But it doesn't work.
I just fixed it.
Is there an option to get other people's usernames?
Not yet. I'll see if I can add a cloud list of usernames. But then I'd need to get the username of whoever is using it, which requires JS, I think.
No usernames. A hacker can hijack it and put sometime bad as their username.
I meant their Snap! username.
They can still hijack it easily.
That's a bad idea. Anyone can put bad words by separating the letters or using certain Unicode that looks like the letter they're trying to type.
can be fixed by removing separators when checking.
How about it's blacklisted instantly on send and receive, then it's whitelisted and stuff not in the whitelist is sent to moderators for approval?
But how would a trust system be implemented (i.e. how will we know that the person setting the cloud variable is really joecooldoo?)
How about it's sent to the private cloud repl?
But if you blacklist let’s say for some weird reason “sup” then people can find many ways to bypass. It is very hard to make a successful one.
If each message needed approval it would not be live.
When a word is approved, it gets added to the whitelist. And posts get sent before words are approved, they just don't have the not-yet-approved words.