Reverse Codification Lite

[joecooldoo]

those are really buggy for some reason, if you look in some of the blocks it actually removes them

[pajamaclaws21]

I made a quick few blocks for easier execution of string'd scripts.

---

---

[details="Import "catch (result) from (blocks)""]

[/details]
Removed import for run()callback() because I did not have the energy to update it

[ego-lay_atman-bay]

@pajamaclaws21

Import "run (string) callback (functions)"

You can also create a script pic of the block definition to import the block from it.

[joecooldoo]

I really need help fixing this bug its like the only one left (that I've found)

This is correct

This is supposed to be zero

its not really a bug, but its how splitting blocks work
if you remove all the slots there are still 1 list option there

[ego-lay_atman-bay]

I don't see a way to do it. My only proposal for snap would be to say the amount of slots in a variadic input, similar to how you can put them in.

[sarpnt]

list > and list> behave differently when joining them
(join list> 3) makes list[3]> but (join list> 3) makes list>
you can compare these two with = and see they aren't the same

[d4s_over_dt4]

@joecooldoo

if you remove all the slots there are still 1 list option there

and that is the input list option

@d4s_over_dt4

first do (keep items <abs()=> over ((slots of _)-100))
then for each element of the result(keep track of the slot number) there shall be a thing:
if the item is a square number then the thing is “Hello, world!”
if the item is 5 then the thing is {clear}
if the item is a factor of 10 then the thing is <0=0>
if the item is between the second and penultimate composite less than 10 then the thing is {()}
if you havent got your thing yet and the item is a prime youre screwed(if the block is a primitive then the item shouldn’t be greater than 10 if you are screwed)
lastly use <<(join input list (append(list(block),(reshape (list ) to (slot number)),list((thing)))))=(block)> xor <item=5>> to detect empty slots

[d4s_over_dt4]

oh right thats what im thinking

[joecooldoo]

Ima try that

[d4s_over_dt4]

i know how to do too
(why is everyone ignoring me)
but idk how to do object or list slots

[joecooldoo]

I got it to work, but for some reason, it doesn't work with rings

[d4s_over_dt4]

aww man do i need to give you de code
there you go

(im making another rev codif lib)

[joecooldoo]

i already figured it out

[joecooldoo]

yaaaaaay no more bugs
(at least right now)

[d4s_over_dt4]

oh ok
my version does work with rings i think

[joecooldoo]

i fixed that too
it was literally one number

[joecooldoo]

aaaand there is another bug somewhere hlweiuruiwrfh

[joecooldoo]

UGGHHH, RINGS ARE SO BUGGY

[d4s_over_dt4]

im making progress

[joecooldoo]

whats that supposed to do
are you also trying to make reverse codification