Personal libraries

Feature Requests Snap! Feature Requests
23

If you can load unpacked chromebook extensions make a folder with manifest.json and popup.html
manifest.json:

{
    "manifest_version": 3,
    "name": "Script Pics",
    "description": "scripics",
    "version": "1.0",
    "action": {
      "default_popup": "popup.html"
    }
  }

popup.html

<p>put script pics in the folder and link them here with <img></p>
<img src="backpack.png">

go to chrome://extensions, enable developer mode, load unpacked, select the folder, pin the new extension, and now you can drag script pics from it to the editor whenever you need

24

did you mean

<p>put script pics in the folder and link them here with &lt;img&gt;</p>
<img src="backpack.png">
25

no? that was just an example
you don't actually put that p in there

26

then why not comment it out

<!--put script pics in the folder and link them here with <img>-->
<img src="backpack.png">
27

idk, does it really matter tho

28

it matters if you're picky about correct syntax (like me or x(ht)ml)

29

Did you know, html allows you to not close <p> tags? Html is not picky about syntax, in fact, a lot of the time, it guesses what you meant to do.

32

i know, and that's why i didn't say html

33

But you did say html

34

It's XHTML, a variant of HTML.

35

Oh, I didn't realize that, since you made "HT" smaller, and I've never used XHTML.

36

me neither, all I know is that its some weird hybrid of xml and html

37

I looked it up, and it's just a more strict version of html. As in, if there are any errors, it won't try to render the page, whereas browsers will try to render html no matter how many errors there are.

48

I would.

49

Well, I’d say that you should flag this topic to be split, but the new topic might carry over the one-month-close thing.

50

I started this topic - should I rename it to “development log”?
(I’m asking @tethrarxitet :smirk:)

51

No, because it's still in Snap! Feature Requests, and part of the topic is about the feature proposal. I think that @tethrarxitet should create a new topic.

52

Flagged. :slight_smile:

53

HTML and XML are nearly one in the same syntax-wise, whereas HTML has a dedicated purpose and XML is just a general-purpose markup language (not to say that HTML isn't that either) with slightly stricter rules. Some guys in like 1998 thought it would be a genius idea to make a version of HTML that is strictly using the syntax of XML, so all tags have to have a closing tag AND be closed in the order they were opened or else it will not render. Also, self closing/single tags (such as <img> or <input>) must.. well self close, meaning all self closing tags must have a slash at the end, such as <img /> and <input />

Basically "use strict"; but for HTML (well I guess that would be things such as not rendering if unordered closing tags and if using obsolete/non-existent tags)

54

This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.