After several hours of work, I finally finished my reverse codification project! Snap! Build Your Own Blocks Anything inside of an apostrophe is considered a value. Anything without an apostrophe is considered another block. Note that there is only a small amou…

[image] warped_wart_wars: don't know what that is

It's codification remade with custom blocks, which allows you to have multiple mappings at the same time.

[image] warped_wart_wars: One-liner that works: I don't know if you can say "one-liner" about a block with internal helpers. :~)

Well... I'm only calling it that because it's one stack block there, the REPORT. (except the WARP, but...)

Ah. It says here anything can be done in one line, in that sense, with functional programming. (But you have to use reporter IF sometimes.)

Should I call it a 23-liner then? Or 24-liner?

Hey I want to add compatability with some extensions, and reduce the length of the code generated. I tried doing this already in the Map Snap Blocks in block, but this doesn't have the conversion of block code to script change, meaning the ability to convert back-and-forth is lost. I can't edit this…

[image] odysseus_ssb: [untitled script pic (4)] Is a primitive.

Well then to convert would I need the table to have the original and shortened types? Because I imagine that would be easier than rewriting code of to work for my needs Between what code of () generates and the shortened form

Snap! Forum

FINALLY! Reverse Codification!

Share your Projects

custom-block, joecooldoo, codification, features, technical

show post in topic

Home
Categories
Guidelines
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy

Powered by Discourse, best viewed with JavaScript enabled