I was able to implement USB, but for BLE I have to implement a custom UI and I quite frankly.. don’t want to that. Check the latest action artifact (GitHub actions) for your OS and tell me if it works.
I use Fedora 
Ubuntu isn’t an OS. It is a Linux Distro.
That is too bad. BLE is the thing that makes SNAP really powerfull when using the MicroBlocks library.
Well, its a system.. that operates. It’s easier just to umbrella Windows, MacOS and Linux Distros under one OS blanket. Anyway, did USB work for you?
The you would have to explain to me how I could test it on my Fedora system? Couldn’t you build an appimage that works on every linux system?
For me a Snap desktop version without BLE has no value in testing.
thank you for the clarification!
Snap! is a PWA. While this is cool, I don’t really see the point? Though, what Jens should do is integrate the close buttons into the Snap! UI, like Visual Studio Code did, as that is apparently something you can do in PWAs.
I think the point is to let people with slow Internet run Snap! quickly but still get updates automatically.
Progressive web apps are downloaded to your device and afaik it alerts you (Chromium does, anyways) if it detects a new version in the manifest.json
Progressive web apps are downloaded to your device
Yes, that’s why they let people with slow Internet run Snap! quickly! :~)
Now that I think of it, I could probably include Crackle within Snap!Desktop…