This sorting algorithm I made is so bad. It doesn’t even do anything 
<(list) = ([sorted V] of (list)) @<:> >
That’s inefficient. Technically it’s different since SORTED OF _ has a different comparison, but wouldn’t it be inefficient to spend time making a sorted form used once instead of just ALL <? Plus, it’s kind of cheating; It’s a sorting algorithm, you shouldn’t use SORTED OF.
I love the name! :~)
Thx!