![]()
you can check if a value came from an arithmetic block or not
not from an arithmetic block
from an arithmetic block
![]()
you can check if a value came from an arithmetic block or not
not from an arithmetic block
from an arithmetic block
for the definition, why not just use the primitive stuff? it will be faster.
I’m using a modified primitve for the if, and the number and string part can’t use primitives because they will say that some strings are numbers
yes, I know. I was asking
this primitive editing use does not seem to serve a purpose, as far as I can see. I believe your block does serve a purpose, so I would not want people’s projects to glitch from using it.
just to clarify what I am saying:
if you replace the primitive, the projects would glitch.
if you use a new block, it will be slower.
I’m wondering, why use that block instead of a primitive?
how the code looks
modifying primitves just turns them into custom blocks btw
In my opinion, using the elseif option in the if <> { } @> block is more readable.
fixed, I just like it if short report blocks inline into the if
again, do you have something against using the primitive to save time?
no, but I’d rather create a block once than to waste time scrolling every time I try to edit