Please let me know if there is anything you would like to add.
the < and > blocks are already variadic
In the accurate/deep blocks’ definition, you weren’t supposed to write “accurate”
The primitive blocks check unicode values:
![]()
Sorry, that was a spelling mistake.
I fixed it.
This block is by default case-insensitive. To fix this, enable "Case sensitivity" in settings.
Thank you for letting me know.
I wasn’t aware of that.
Meanwhile \textsf{"a"} < \textsf{"B"} < \textsf{"c"} returns true while 97 < 66 < 99 is false.
case sensitivity perhaps? idk i havent tried it
Yeah, < and > convert to lowercase from my testing.
Added deep map, deep keep, find last item, find first item index, and split _ by block.
Thank you. We will make improvements.
We? Is your account run by multiple people?
I’m sorry, I’m using Google Translate to communicate…
Oh. It’s all good ![]()
thank you




